{"schema_version":"GreyResearchObject 1.2","id":"GSX:HH-001","slug":"economics-of-living-together","series_slug":"household-economics","series_title":"Household Economics","series_number":"01","paper_number":"01","title":"The Economics of Living Together","version":"1.0","status":"published","primary_question":"How do early cohabitation, delayed cohabitation, and separate households compare in a Gauteng lifetime scenario?","summary":"A Gauteng lifetime scenario comparing early cohabitation, delayed cohabitation and separate households.","topics":["cohabitation","lifetime-wealth","housing","south-africa"],"geographies":["South Africa","Gauteng"],"keywords":["Cohabitation","Lifetime wealth","Housing","South Africa","Gauteng","economics","living","together","early","cohabitation","delayed","separate","households","compare","gauteng","lifetime","scenario"],"related_questions":["What is the lifetime household comparison between living together and maintaining separate households?","How does the timing of cohabitation change the cost of living and saving?"],"answer":{"conditional_answer":"For two Gauteng adults bringing home R30,000 and R20,000 a month, combining households at 25 rather than 35 leaves about R3.972 million more combined household wealth at 75 in the average scenario, in constant 2026 rand. The direct living-cost saving is about R1.059 million. The larger gap comes from investing that earlier saving and from avoiding expensive negative balances.","evidence_status":"modelled","assumption_ids":["GSX:HH-001:A01","GSX:HH-001:A02","GSX:HH-001:A03","GSX:HH-001:A04"],"result_ids":["GSX:HH-001:R01","GSX:HH-001:R02"],"main_limitation":"This is a modelled scenario, not a forecast, and it is household wealth rather than each person's wealth. The manuscript keeps the relationship intact and invests the surplus. The advantage can disappear or reverse if the shared household costs almost as much as two homes, if the saving is consumed, or if separation costs exceed the accumulated benefit. Cohabitation here is a shared household, not a marriage result.","sensitivity":"high"},"entities":["South Africa","Gauteng","cohabitation","lifetime-wealth","housing","south-africa"],"methods":[{"id":"GSX:HH-001:M01","name":"Lifetime household-timing model","model_class":"scenario model","purpose":"The model follows two household paths from age 25 to 75 in constant 2026 rand. They differ in when they combine households. After 35 their housing arrangement matches, so the remaining gap comes from returns on the earlier balance or from the cost of a negative balance. Best, average, and worst cases change growth, returns, shocks, children, and housing.","implementation_file":"research/source/expanded_lifetime_model.py"}],"parameters":[{"id":"P01","name":"Two Gauteng earners","symbol":"see the manuscript","description":"The household is two adults in Gauteng with take-home pay of R30,000 and R20,000 a month. The results are combined household wealth, not each person's legal ownership.","value":"30000","unit":"constant 2026 rand per month, higher take-home pay","price_year":"2026","scenario_values":{"central":"30000"},"source_ids":["GSX:HH-001:PDF"]}],"equations":["The manuscript states the accounting identities in prose. No separate machine equation list is published."],"scenarios":[{"id":"S01","name":"Average case, age 75, early consolidation minus later consolidation","role":"baseline","description":"In the average case, the Early household holds R3.972 million more combined wealth at 75 than the Later household, in constant 2026 rand.","assumption_overrides":{"note":"The central scenario uses the registered assumptions."},"probability_status":"illustrative","probability":"not assigned","rationale":"The manuscript labels this as a scenario."}],"unresolved_questions":["How do early cohabitation, delayed cohabitation, and separate households compare in a Gauteng lifetime scenario?"],"research_type":"exploratory_simulation","evidence_status":"modelled","peer_review_status":"none","external_review_status":"none","ai_assistance":{"disclosure":"GreyScienx manuscripts are prepared with substantial AI assistance in research, drafting, and computation. This record is not peer-reviewed. The published manuscript does not itemise AI participation by activity.","itemised":false},"date_modified":"2026-09-28","date_note":"Date of this machine record. It is not a separately catalogued manuscript issue date.","authors":[{"name":"Pakang Senosha","affiliation":"University of Pretoria","slug":"pakang-senosha"}],"extraction_status":"full_text_claim_led","manuscript":{"study_id":"GSX:HH-001","source_path":"research/publications/economics-of-living-together-v0.5.md","source_sha256":"9ac1edb15cae5cfb673bc18ecd7c32eff09620cd1d64aa6bd3ba91ed8b8f8d54","source_bytes":40146,"character_count":40068,"word_count":5806,"headings":[{"level":1,"title":"The Economics of Living Together","slug":"the-economics-of-living-together","line":1},{"level":2,"title":"From the cohabitation dividend to a hypothetical lifetime model","slug":"from-the-cohabitation-dividend-to-a-hypothetical-lifetime-model","line":3},{"level":1,"title":"Part I: The economic foundation","slug":"part-i-the-economic-foundation","line":8},{"level":2,"title":"1. Define the experiment","slug":"1-define-the-experiment","line":12},{"level":2,"title":"2. Microeconomic effects","slug":"2-microeconomic-effects","line":26},{"level":3,"title":"Lower cost of maintaining a standard of living","slug":"lower-cost-of-maintaining-a-standard-of-living","line":28},{"level":3,"title":"Greater saving and wealth accumulation","slug":"greater-saving-and-wealth-accumulation","line":42},{"level":3,"title":"Risk pooling","slug":"risk-pooling","line":67},{"level":3,"title":"Household production and time","slug":"household-production-and-time","line":81},{"level":3,"title":"Increased access to assets","slug":"increased-access-to-assets","line":87},{"level":3,"title":"Bargaining, dependency and unequal welfare","slug":"bargaining-dependency-and-unequal-welfare","line":100},{"level":3,"title":"Costs and possible diseconomies","slug":"costs-and-possible-diseconomies","line":116},{"level":2,"title":"3. Macroeconomic effects","slug":"3-macroeconomic-effects","line":132},{"level":3,"title":"Fewer households and lower housing demand","slug":"fewer-households-and-lower-housing-demand","line":134},{"level":3,"title":"Less duplicated consumption","slug":"less-duplicated-consumption","line":151},{"level":3,"title":"The welfare–GDP paradox","slug":"the-welfare-gdp-paradox","line":175},{"level":3,"title":"Labour supply","slug":"labour-supply","line":187},{"level":3,"title":"Financial stability","slug":"financial-stability","line":199},{"level":3,"title":"Energy, infrastructure and emissions","slug":"energy-infrastructure-and-emissions","line":211},{"level":3,"title":"Government and municipal finance","slug":"government-and-municipal-finance","line":223},{"level":2,"title":"4. Why South Africa is an important case","slug":"4-why-south-africa-is-an-important-case","line":236},{"level":2,"title":"Initial thesis","slug":"initial-thesis","line":254},{"level":1,"title":"Part II: The ten-year head start","slug":"part-ii-the-ten-year-head-start","line":268},{"level":2,"title":"The question","slug":"the-question","line":270},{"level":2,"title":"Meet the two couples","slug":"meet-the-two-couples","line":285},{"level":2,"title":"The starting Gauteng budget","slug":"the-starting-gauteng-budget","line":306},{"level":2,"title":"How the lifetime model works","slug":"how-the-lifetime-model-works","line":323},{"level":2,"title":"Three possible lives","slug":"three-possible-lives","line":349},{"level":2,"title":"Best case: the early saving becomes its own source of wealth","slug":"best-case-the-early-saving-becomes-its-own-source-of-wealth","line":383},{"level":2,"title":"Average case: a ten-year housing decision becomes a R4 million gap","slug":"average-case-a-ten-year-housing-decision-becomes-a-r4-million-gap","line":404},{"level":2,"title":"Worst case: cohabitation narrows the damage but cannot repair the retirement system","slug":"worst-case-cohabitation-narrows-the-damage-but-cannot-repair-the-retirement-system","line":431},{"level":2,"title":"The comparison in one table","slug":"the-comparison-in-one-table","line":458},{"level":2,"title":"Why the difference keeps growing after both couples move in","slug":"why-the-difference-keeps-growing-after-both-couples-move-in","line":479},{"level":2,"title":"What the expanded model now includes","slug":"what-the-expanded-model-now-includes","line":497},{"level":2,"title":"What still cannot be reduced to a credible rand value","slug":"what-still-cannot-be-reduced-to-a-credible-rand-value","line":509},{"level":2,"title":"The household and the individuals","slug":"the-household-and-the-individuals","line":517},{"level":2,"title":"What this means outside the household","slug":"what-this-means-outside-the-household","line":530},{"level":2,"title":"The research claim","slug":"the-research-claim","line":540},{"level":2,"title":"Final observation","slug":"final-observation","line":550}]},"claims":[{"id":"GSX:HH-001:C01","local_id":"C01","claim":"For two Gauteng adults bringing home R30,000 and R20,000 a month, combining households at 25 rather than 35 leaves about R3.972 million more combined household wealth at 75 in the average scenario, in constant 2026 rand. The direct living-cost saving is about R1.059 million. The larger gap comes from investing that earlier saving and from avoiding expensive negative balances.","claim_type":"conditional","status":"conditional","evidence_status":"modelled","confidence":null,"depends_on":["GSX:HH-001:A01","GSX:HH-001:A02","GSX:HH-001:A03","GSX:HH-001:A04"],"result":"GSX:HH-001:R01","results":["GSX:HH-001:R01","GSX:HH-001:R02"],"sensitivity":"high","main_limitation":"This is a modelled scenario, not a forecast, and it is household wealth rather than each person's wealth. The manuscript keeps the relationship intact and invests the surplus. The advantage can disappear or reverse if the shared household costs almost as much as two homes, if the saving is consumed, or if separation costs exceed the accumulated benefit. Cohabitation here is a shared household, not a marriage result.","source_study":"GSX:HH-001","version":"1.0","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/claims/C01","supported_by":["GSX:HH-001:PDF"],"contradicted_by":[],"qualifies":[],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:C02","local_id":"C02","claim":"Across the manuscript's three scenarios, earlier household combination still leaves the stronger position at 75. The lead is R11.287 million in the best case, R3.972 million in the average case, and R1.882 million in the worst case. In the worst case that lead only narrows two large funding gaps.","claim_type":"conditional","status":"conditional","evidence_status":"modelled","confidence":null,"depends_on":["GSX:HH-001:A01","GSX:HH-001:A02","GSX:HH-001:A04","GSX:HH-001:A05"],"result":"GSX:HH-001:R01","results":["GSX:HH-001:R01","GSX:HH-001:R03"],"sensitivity":"high","main_limitation":"Negative amounts are unmet consumption if the household does not change course. They are not a statement that a bank would finance the shortfall. The worst case cannot repair stagnant earnings, repeated unemployment, weak returns, or inadequate retirement income.","source_study":"GSX:HH-001","version":"1.0","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/claims/C02","supported_by":["GSX:HH-001:PDF"],"contradicted_by":[],"qualifies":[],"contradicts":[]}],"assumptions":[{"id":"GSX:HH-001:A01","local_id":"A01","name":"Two Gauteng earners","statement":"The household is two adults in Gauteng with take-home pay of R30,000 and R20,000 a month. The results are combined household wealth, not each person's legal ownership.","value":"30000","unit":"constant 2026 rand per month, higher take-home pay","type":"model assumption","provenance":"Manuscript research claim and scenario table","evidence_strength":"illustrative","sensitivity":"high","alternatives":["Different earnings","A different split of expenses and ownership"],"href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/assumptions/A01"},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:A02","local_id":"A02","name":"Ten-year difference in household timing","statement":"The Early couple combines adequate households at 25. The Later couple combines them at 35. From 35 onward the model gives both the same housing arrangement, income, expenses, shocks, and retirement assumptions.","value":"10","unit":"years","type":"model assumption","provenance":"Manuscript lifetime design","evidence_strength":"model assumption","sensitivity":"high","alternatives":["A shorter or longer period of separate households"],"href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/assumptions/A02"},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:A03","local_id":"A03","name":"Average-case returns and costs","statement":"In the average case, real salary growth and real living-cost growth are both 0.75% a year. The net real investment return is 3% a year after fees and tax drag. The initial monthly cohabitation dividend is R8,500.","value":"3","unit":"percent net real return per year","type":"model assumption","provenance":"Manuscript average-case table","evidence_strength":"model assumption","sensitivity":"high","alternatives":["Best case, 5% net real","Worst case, 1% net real"],"href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/assumptions/A03"},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:A04","local_id":"A04","name":"Surplus is invested","statement":"The model invests the available surplus. It does not spend that surplus on a higher lifestyle.","value":"qualitative","unit":"not a scalar","type":"model assumption","provenance":"Manuscript interpretation","evidence_strength":"model assumption","sensitivity":"high","alternatives":["The saving is consumed instead of invested"],"href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/assumptions/A04"},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:A05","local_id":"A05","name":"The relationship remains intact","statement":"Both relationships remain intact through the simulation. Separation, custody, maintenance, and a second replacement home are not given a numeric cost.","value":"qualitative","unit":"not a scalar","type":"model assumption","provenance":"Manuscript limit on what is simulated","evidence_strength":"model assumption","sensitivity":"high","alternatives":["A breakup whose costs exceed the accumulated benefit"],"href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/assumptions/A05"}],"results":[{"id":"GSX:HH-001:R01","local_id":"R01","statement":"In the average case, the Early household holds R3.972 million more combined wealth at 75 than the Later household, in constant 2026 rand.","value":"3972000","unit":"constant 2026 rand","scenario":"Average case, age 75, early consolidation minus later consolidation","evidence_status":"modelled","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/results/R01"},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:R02","local_id":"R02","statement":"In the average case, the Early household spends about R1.059 million less on living costs over the model. At 35, before the later years are financially identical, its lead is R1.188 million.","value":"1059000","unit":"constant 2026 rand of living costs avoided","scenario":"Average case, lifetime living costs and age-35 lead","evidence_status":"modelled","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/results/R02"},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:R03","local_id":"R03","statement":"At 75 the Early household's lead is R11.287 million in the best case and R1.882 million in the worst case. In the worst case both positions are large funding gaps: about -R16.346 million and -R18.228 million.","value":"11287000","unit":"constant 2026 rand, best-case lead at 75","scenario":"Best case and worst case at age 75","evidence_status":"modelled","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/results/R03"}],"models":[{"id":"GSX:HH-001:M01","local_id":"M01","name":"Lifetime household-timing model","statement":"The model follows two household paths from age 25 to 75 in constant 2026 rand. They differ in when they combine households. After 35 their housing arrangement matches, so the remaining gap comes from returns on the earlier balance or from the cost of a negative balance. Best, average, and worst cases change growth, returns, shocks, children, and housing.","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/models/M01"}],"sources":[{"id":"GSX:HH-001:PDF","type":"manuscript","title":"The Economics of Living Together","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/greyscienx-economics-of-living-together.pdf","author_or_publisher":"GreyScienx","date":"2026-09-27","locator":"19 pages; 0.57 MB","note":"Published manuscript used for this semantic-twin extraction. External references remain represented in the manuscript unless separately registered.","supports":["GSX:HH-001:C01"],"contradicts":[],"pages":19,"size":"0.57 MB","media_type":"application/pdf"},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC01","type":"web_reference","title":"Review of Income and Wealth study","href":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/roiw.12483","author_or_publisher":"onlinelibrary.wiley.com","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC02","type":"web_reference","title":"NBER research on wage risk and spousal insurance","href":"https://www.nber.org/papers/w28294","author_or_publisher":"nber.org","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC03","type":"web_reference","title":"World Bank poverty-measurement guidance","href":"https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/156931468138883186/pdf/2980000182131497813.pdf","author_or_publisher":"documents1.worldbank.org","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC04","type":"web_reference","title":"Journal of Urban Economics study","href":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094119013000284","author_or_publisher":"sciencedirect.com","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC05","type":"web_reference","title":"Ecological Economics study","href":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180091500213X","author_or_publisher":"sciencedirect.com","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC06","type":"web_reference","title":"Stats SA General Household Survey 2024","href":"https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0318/P03182024.pdf","author_or_publisher":"statssa.gov.za","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC07","type":"web_reference","title":"Statistics South Africa","href":"https://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=17283","author_or_publisher":"statssa.gov.za","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC08","type":"web_reference","title":"PayProp Rental Index coverage","href":"https://www.citizen.co.za/business/personal-finance/average-rent-in-gauteng-tops-r9k-how-do-other-provinces-measure-up/","author_or_publisher":"citizen.co.za","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC09","type":"web_reference","title":"Stats SA Income and Expenditure Survey","href":"https://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=17995","author_or_publisher":"statssa.gov.za","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC10","type":"web_reference","title":"UCT Retirement Fund investment objectives","href":"https://uctrf.co.za/systems/uctrf/useruploads/UCTRF%20Summary%20of%20Investment%20returns%20for%202025-06%20SA.pdf","author_or_publisher":"uctrf.co.za","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]},{"id":"GSX:HH-001:SRC11","type":"web_reference","title":"South African Reserve Bank","href":"https://www.sarb.co.za/en/home/what-we-do/monetary-policy","author_or_publisher":"sarb.co.za","date":"see cited resource","locator":"URL cited in the manuscript","note":"The manuscript cites this resource. Inclusion does not independently validate it or assign it to a specific claim.","supports":["claim-level support not assigned"],"contradicts":[]}],"datasets":[{"id":"D01","title":"The Economics of Living Together","description":"The published manuscript is the data statement for this form.","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together","geographic_coverage":"South Africa, Gauteng","licence":"The reading copy is published on greyscienx.com. No separate open licence is stated."}],"figures":[{"id":"F01","title":"Lifetime net-worth trajectories for the Early and Later couples in all three scenarios","caption":"Figure 1. Total net worth includes liquid investments, pension assets and net housing equity. Negative values are unfunded continuation of the modelled lifestyle.","alt_text":"Lifetime net-worth trajectories for the Early and Later couples in all three scenarios","image_file":"C:/Users/Deriv/Desktop/GreyScienx/research/publications/lifetime-wealth-trajectories-v0.5.png","data_file":"research/source/economics-of-living-together/model_results.json","result_ids":["GSX:HH-001:R01"],"source_ids":["GSX:HH-001:PDF"]},{"id":"F02","title":"The Early couple's financial lead from age 25 to 75","caption":"Figure 2. From 35 onward, the direct housing arrangements are identical. The remaining gap changes through investment returns or deficit-financing costs.","alt_text":"The Early couple's financial lead from age 25 to 75","image_file":"C:/Users/Deriv/Desktop/GreyScienx/research/publications/ten-year-head-start-v0.5.png","data_file":"research/source/economics-of-living-together/model_results.json","result_ids":["GSX:HH-001:R01"],"source_ids":["GSX:HH-001:PDF"]},{"id":"F03","title":"Cumulative lifetime pressures included in the expanded model","caption":"Figure 3. The bars show the cumulative value of several newly modelled pressures. Fees and tax drag is an opportunity cost; the other bars are spending or income not received.","alt_text":"Cumulative lifetime pressures included in the expanded model","image_file":"C:/Users/Deriv/Desktop/GreyScienx/research/publications/expanded-model-lifetime-pressures-v0.5.png","data_file":"research/source/economics-of-living-together/model_results.json","result_ids":["GSX:HH-001:R01"],"source_ids":["GSX:HH-001:PDF"]}],"tables":[{"id":"T00","title":"Tables in the manuscript","description":"Tables remain in the manuscript and are not exported as separate data files.","file":"research/publications/economics-of-living-together-v0.5.md","result_ids":["GSX:HH-001:R01"],"source_ids":["GSX:HH-001:PDF"]}],"reproducibility":{"code_available":true,"data_available":true,"environment_available":false,"random_seed":"the published statement does not rely on a recorded random seed","software":["Python 3"],"repository_url":null},"editorial":{"required_checks":{"stable_ids":true,"no_naked_claims":true,"assumptions_linked":true,"results_linked":true,"sources_linked":true,"units_complete":true,"price_years_complete":true,"scenario_labels_complete":true,"figure_data_available":true,"alt_text_complete":true,"text_extraction_verified":true,"pdf_visual_qa_complete":true,"links_checked":true,"reproducibility_checked":true,"ai_disclosure_complete":true,"human_final_review":true},"blocking_issues":[],"warnings":["Reproduction verifies the registered JSON baseline; it is not independent empirical validation of the model.","Publisher-reviewed candidate links are accepted as contextual manuscript references, not as independent empirical validation of modelled outputs.","2 cited external links could not be verified because the server returned a transient error or the request did not complete."],"change_log":[{"version":"1.0","date":"2026-09-29","author":"GreyScienx","summary":"Filled the semantic-twin form from the published manuscript. Empty fields now say what is registered or what is not published.","changed_ids":["GSX:HH-001"]},{"version":"1.0","date":"2026-09-29","author":"Pakang Senosha","summary":"Recorded publisher final review, PDF visual approval, and acceptance of candidate links as contextual references.","changed_ids":["GSX:HH-001"]}]},"related_studies":[{"id":"GSX:HH-002","slug":"the-first-three-years-advantage","title":"The First Three Years Advantage","href":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/the-first-three-years-advantage"}],"links":{"html":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together","markdown":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/economics-of-living-together/markdown","manuscript":"https://greyscienx.com/api/v1/research/economics-of-living-together/manuscript","json":"https://greyscienx.com/api/v1/research/economics-of-living-together","pdf":"https://greyscienx.com/research/household-economics/greyscienx-economics-of-living-together.pdf"},"citation":{"machine":"GreyScienx, GSX:HH-001, version 1.0","text":"GreyScienx. The Economics of Living Together. GSX:HH-001. Version 1.0."},"retrieval_note":"The complete source manuscript is available as Markdown. Published claim objects are a claim-led extraction, not an exhaustive list of every statement in the paper. Read each claim with its assumptions and main limitation; the catalog summary is not a finding."}