Community,
after review.
Profiles, critiques, forks, and revisions are research objects. A validator checks the shape. A person reviews the object before it joins the public record.
Publication rule
A valid POST is kept in the review queue and stays unpublished. The public record changes when a person publishes it.
Awaiting review
The review queue is empty.
Profiles
Published authors
Pakang Senosha is on the public record, with 29 study attributions.
Critiques
A critique names its target.
The object records the study, the claim when one is named, the author, the type, the argument, the evidence, and the proposed change. Types: assumption, method, data, interpretation, mathematics, source, reproducibility, scope.
Forks
A fork records the disagreement.
It keeps the parent study and states the changed assumptions, data, and methods, then the new results and conclusion with their evidence status and limitation.
Revisions and submissions
Version 1.0 is the public text.
A revision names the study, the version it starts from, and the change. A submission names the question, the research type, the evidence status, and the AI assistance. A valid POST is kept for review and stays off the public record.