03 · The R350 Counterfactual

The R350 Industrialisation Counterfactual

The productive-capital alternative to repeated emergency cash transfers.

PDF · 21 pages · 1.38 MB · 03.01 · GSX:SRD-001

Study record · GSX:SRD-001

What productive-capital alternative to repeated emergency cash transfers does the R350 counterfactual examine?

Evidence status: Modelled. Counterfactual. Version 1.0. Peer review: none. The paragraph under the title is the published summary.

Conditional answer · GSX:SRD-001:C01

If the SRD envelope of about R253.5 billion in constant 2026 rand had been reprioritised into an industrial fund, the best case holds about R789 billion in productive assets by 2050 and generates roughly R39 billion a year in public cash. The annual cash flow exceeds one current SRD budget year only around 2049.

Evidence status: Modelled. Sensitivity: high. Depends on GSX:SRD-001:A01, GSX:SRD-001:A02. The envelope is a counterfactual resource, not yet a factory. The best case depends on projects being selected, built, operated and renewed for decades. This paper does not value what households would have lost if the grant had never been paid.

Related questions

3

Assumptions

Assumptions

These are the registered model assumptions. A result stays conditional on the ones a claim names.

1

Model

Model

The registered model statement. It is a scenario model, and the manuscript remains the full specification.

2

Results

Results

Modelled scenario results. They are not forecasts.

Sensitivity

Limitations

The envelope is a counterfactual resource, not yet a factory. The best case depends on projects being selected, built, operated and renewed for decades. This paper does not value what households would have lost if the grant had never been paid.

These paths are the reprioritised-fund counterfactual. A borrowed fund would also carry a matching liability, and neither path is automatically superior to having paid the grant.

2

Claims

Claims

Each claim names the assumptions it uses and the limitation that travels with it.

Sources and reproducibility

The PDF and complete Markdown source are both published.

Full manuscript: 5 647 words across 41 indexed headings. Source checksum: 45b388b09178…. Code recorded: yes. Data recorded: yes. Environment recorded: no. Published files: 3. the published statement does not rely on a recorded random seed A public code repository is not published.

Community record · version 1.0

Published community record: 0 critiques, 0 forks, and 0 revisions.

Pakang Senosha is the author on this version. External review: none. A later critique or revision appears here after a person publishes it.

Share this article

A permanent link to the work.

Use this page when citing or sharing the study. The PDF contains the complete analysis.

03

More in this series

The R350 Counterfactual

What South Africa might have built with the SRD budget—and what society would have lost by withholding it.